Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Spellslingers | -nausea- | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Jeskai Control | scipios | 8-1 | None |
| Izzet Spellslingers | sanpop | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765784 |
| Jeskai Control | soulstrong | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 7-1 | None |
| Izzet Spellslingers | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | junkmener | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765778 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | darthkid | 7-2 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | kanister | 7-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Legends , Grixis Monument , Izzet Aggro , Izzet Artist's Monument , Izzet Hellraiser , Izzet Mill , Izzet Monument , Izzet Otters , Izzet Pirates
Meta Performance Analysis
Riverpyre Verge ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 63.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Riverpyre Verge is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 49.53 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Riverpyre Verge has a win rate of 79.4%, making it 6.6% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 33 | 85.3% | 19 |
| Slick Sequence | Instant | 26 | 82.2% | 15 |
| Flashfreeze | Instant | 14 | 81.2% | 6 |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 72 | 80.3% | 34 |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 44 | 78.8% | 21 |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 18 | 78.3% | 8 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 48 | 77.8% | 22 |
| Kutzil's Flanker | Creature — Cat Warrior | 40 | 77.8% | 20 |
| Wrenn's Resolve | Sorcery | 14 | 77.6% | 8 |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 50 | 77.1% | 22 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Riverpyre Verge than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obliterating Bolt | Sorcery | 2 | 7 | 88.0% | 74.5% | +13.5% |
| Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 87.5% | 77.0% | +10.5% |
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 4 | 10 | 87.9% | 78.1% | +9.8% |
| Fear of Missing Out | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 2 | 5 | 87.0% | 77.3% | +9.6% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 23 | 84.5% | 77.3% | +7.1% |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 14 | 84.2% | 77.1% | +7.1% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 7 | 82.4% | 77.5% | +4.9% |
| Boltwave | Sorcery | 1 | 13 | 86.9% | 82.7% | +4.2% |
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 2 | 8 | 80.0% | 76.2% | +3.8% |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 56 | 80.7% | 76.9% | +3.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Spellslingers | 135 | 95.1% | 73.0% |
| Unknown Archetype | 41 | 11.3% | 44.0% |
| Jeskai Control | 38 | 79.2% | 75.7% |
| Jeskai Monument | 19 | 61.3% | 48.0% |
| Izzet Repurpose | 18 | 100.0% | 39.4% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.